Creating Katrina, Rebuilding Resilience

<p>PART I. INTRODUCTION AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK<br>1. Editors’ introduction: The voices of the barefoot Scholars<br>2. Settlement shifts in the wake of catastrophe<br>3. Vulnerability-plus theory: The integration of community disaster vulnerability and resiliency theories <br>4. A systems approach to vulnerability and resilience in post-Katrina New Orleans<br>5. “Built-in” structural violence and vulnerability: A common threat to resilient disaster recovery </p> <p>PART II. DISASTER VULNERABILITY <br>6. Setting the Stage for the Katrina Catastrophe: Environmental Degradation, Engineering Miscalculation, Ignoring Science, and Human Mismanagement<br>7. Three centuries in the making: Hurricane Katrina from an historical perspective <br>8. The resilience in the shadows of catastrophe: Addressing the existence and implications of vulnerability in New Orleans and Southeastern Louisiana <br>9. Problematizing vulnerability: Unpacking gender, intersectionality, and the normative disaster paradigm</p> <p>PART III. DISASTER RESILIENCE<br>10. Culture and resilience: How music has fostered resilience in post-Katrina New Orleans<br>11. Resilience among vulnerable populations: The neglected role of culture<br>12. Faith-based organizations in Katrina: The United Methodist Church<br>13. Collective efficacy, social capital and resilience: An inquiry into the relationship between social infrastructure and resilience after Hurricane Katrina<br>14. Dynamics of early recovery in two historically low-income New Orleans’ neighborhoods: Treme´ and Central City</p> <p>PART IV. CONCLUSION AND LESSONS LEARNED<br>15. The Katrina catastrophe and science: Does experiencing a catastrophe at “ground zero” have impacts on the professional performance/identity of social  scientist survivors?<br>16. How barefoot scholars were deployed: The good, the bad, the ugly <br>17. Lessons learned from New Orleans on vulnerability, resilience, and their integration </p>